Plattsburgh State Art Museum The Joseph C. and Joan T. Burke Gallery |
Channeling Ghosts:
Marion Wagschal Paints the Figure October 1 through November 13, 2005 Open Daily noon to 4pm, except Holidays Monograph by James D. Campbell |
![]() Click for Larger Image Elegy After Manet, 2002 acrylic on canvas, 48" x 84" |
Preface
Artist's Statement
Monograph
The Exhibition
|
SOMETIMES THE BODY TURNS against itself, a foot slips, a bone breaks. When my grandmother was dying, my mother fell, fracturing two ribs. I have been that lonely. But often after another sorrow the body falls another way— into bliss. —Lucinda Grey, “The Woman Who has Eaten the Moon” (1) |
Page 1
Go to: [1, 2, 3, 4]
Marion Wagschal’s talent and tenacity are legendary in Montreal, where she has painted the human figure for over four decades on an arclike
trajectory towards truth. Few artists have offered such intimate and often harrowing glimpses into the raw truths of our embodiment.
Fewer have assessed human damage and the possibility of exaltation so well. Fewer still have dilated with such rigor and eloquence on the
darkness in our nature—and the indissoluble wedding of art and our woundedness.
Often depicted naked in her painting, and with no cosmetic allure whatsoever, the body’s postural feints and parries in time and circumstance
are her enduring subject. She has explored with rare ardor, insistence and perspicacity the body’s lesser-seen (but subjectively far better
known) nightside: attrition, dissolution and still higher orders of damage. Unlike the cold air of the morgue that infiltrates Lucian Freud’s
paintings of the figure, Wagschal’s work is suffused with inflammatory warmth. This warmth is so enveloping, it is difficult to turn away. Her
figuration has volume, vigor and tremendous formal charisma. Internal geometry in her paintings is rigorous and the handling of figural
volumetrics is sculpturally pristine. Consider a painting like Attachment (1998) in which the treatment of the figures is as suggestively
heartrending as it is overarching in radiance.
If we accept the invitation with alacrity and step over its threshold into the humid warmth of this portraiture, the hegemony of its flesh
tones, it is not long before the work proceeds to unsettle and haunt—and exact its price. A feeling of strangeness prevails, but it is never
estranging for those who are prepared to see. Indeed, looking at these paintings with patience and intensity yields something like – bliss.
There is a lyricism and clarity that stem from deconstructing and reconstituting the human figure and its timelines with such Socratic
honesty.
Make no mistake: these are visionary paintings. They are also
painterly instruments of interrogation, duress, restless darkness—
and epiphany. Like the wonderful optical instruments of the 19th
century, they reveal another order of reality: one magnified,
dismantled, meticulously reassembled, and made sea-change
strange. While trading in darkness, the paintings possess an
unexpected and luminous beauty.
Wagschal paints the figure but central to her portraiture is the
evocation of ‘duende’. Originating in the south of Spain, the word
“Duende” has only recently been imported into the English
language. Dictionaries list several
related meanings, which are relevant
here, such as charm, ghost, evil spirit,
inspiration, magic, fire, goblin, demon,
and magnetic force. In Wagschal’s often
harrowing art of portraiture, all of
these meanings are pertinent. Her work
possesses a palpable magic, a magnetic
pull. It is fraught with all manner of
hungry ghosts that assail us at her will.
However, I use the word ‘duende’ more
specifically still; as the great Spanish
poet Federico Garcia Lorca meant it,
as that dark inexorable power of earth
an artist wrestles with and births in
creative work. Paintings such as
Woman
with Still Life (1998), Cyclops (1972),
Burning Spoons (1994) and Ur (2005) are
all masterful duende paintings.
The idea of duende was a leitmotif of
Lorca’s poetry and thought throughout
his lifetime and I will argue here that it
is a leitmotif of Wagschal’s figurative
art as well, though seldom considered
in the extant commentary on that work.
Lorca once delivered a famous lecture,
Play and Theory of the Duende, in which
he interpreted the duende as a demon of the earth itself whose
voice speaks definitively of our finitude, our waywardness, of
fevers in the blood and damnation felt viscerally in the gut. He
argued that it manifests readily in the three art forms most
susceptible to it: dance, music, and the bullfight. He also allowed
that it could manifest itself in paint on canvas ground as was the
case, for him, with Goya. (2)
Duende is truly a hypnotic and magnetic attraction that grabs us
by the cojones. It is said in Andalusia that some flamenco artists
possess a charismatic magnetism so great the listener is held captive
under its spell. As we gaze upon Wagschal’s paintings, they send
cascading waves of emotion through us like an electric current.
When I say that Wagschal’s figuration adumbrates duende; I take
my inspiration from Lorca’s definition in the sense of the infusion
of real live form with chthonic power, with dark creative earthforce,
and the channeling of it. I think of a small painting like
Meditation as a true duende icon, so redolent of this earth-force.
Her sitters are possessed by the duende she uncovers in their very
being, in their subconscious, bone marrow deep but also latent in
every time-bound fold of flesh. Her figuration raises duende from
the floorboards of their being to the ceiling of their spirit. To call
Wagschal a tremendous savant of an observer, would be an
understatement. Her work never loses touch with our own lived
reality, and its attempt to channel the ‘dark sounds’ of the duende
in terms of the seasons of the body and the slow disintegration
of the flesh leaves us inordinately sensitive to the pitch and tenor
of those sounds. The arrival of duende marks the annunciation
of outer darkness at the inner core of her subjects, promising
wholesale psychological transformation for them and, by
extension, for us. This is no cheap exorcism but a profound
celebration of darkness in the blood. If we are at all attuned to
her remarkable project, we come to understand what it means to
bear witness to our embodied state.
If duende is organically found in music and dance, and enjoys
primacy therein, it is only because of the touchstone of the body.
So it is with Wagschal’s art wherein the depiction of the body,
both living and dying, incarnates
duende. Her paradigms of
embodiment stake their claim upon
us—our lived and living bodies – and
take fertile root in our imagination.
I chose Lucinda Grey’s poem as
epigraph to this essay because she
articulates with wonderful clarity in
her short lyric poems the ways of
duende through her portrayal of
another artist – and one who is,
incidentally, an avatar for Marion
Wagschal, namely, Frida Kahlo. Her
life—her damage, her restless search
for transcendence, and the
quintessence of her own duende-fed
artistic vision – matches Wagschal’s
own. (3)
What Claire Bateman wrote of Grey’s
poetry is an equally fitting description
of Wagschal’s work: “She immerses
the reader in duende...Much of the
book deals with paradox: Everything
that promises transcendence and
transformation—the body, romance
and even language itself—eventually
fails due to distortion, breakdown, catastrophe, or simple
insufficiency. Grey portrays glory as inseparable from damage…”
(4) (My emphasis.) Here is the hard, unassailable truth at the core
of Marion Wagschal’s portraiture. A close observer of
contemporary life, she understands that glory is inseparable from
damage. In her portraits, as previously noted, the two are
irremediably married. Her once-noble heads are glorious even in
their bruised abandon; caught in the deliquescence of their
dissolution, they remind us of our own mortality. Of course, in
doing so, they also remind us what it is to be alive.
There is underlying technical virtuosity in these paintings so
profound that it never advertises itself as such. She can sweep us
away with a brushstroke, and her rendering of ravaged expanses
of human flesh, so achingly true and microscopically precise, is
marked by flawless craftsmanship. In this respect, I think of
Suzanne Valadon (1865-1938). Valadon was a remarkable woman,
personage, and artist. She was depicted in Renoir’s Les Baigneuses
(1887). Early on, she was a street waif in Paris who morphed into
a circus artiste who was in demand. Suffering a fall from a horse’s
back, she became by necessity an artist’s model and then a very
accomplished painter. Interesting to remark here on Wagschal’s
most recent work, Ur (2005), a pure History Painting executed
with breathtaking élan, in which a male figure has been catapulted
from a horse’s back and ends up crushed beneath the horse, his
eyes open, mouth wide in agony, blood spilled, amidst an anarchy
of earth tones, small fires, rampant red tapestry, the hectic
conflation all about sounding the death-knell for both horse and
rider.
There was a psychological complexity in Valadon’s paintings that
should be mentioned here because it echoes Wagschal’s own. In
The Abandoned Doll (1921), a painting she particularly admires, the
subject matter—the mother telling her daughter about pubescence,
the doll abandoned on the floor signaling the putting away of
childish things – has a definite edge. And, in other Valadon
paintings, the appearance of heavy-set women comfortable in their
own corporeality reminds us what a commanding feminocentric
figurative painter Valadon was, and perhaps role model for
Wagschal.
Human labor and situational angst have taken their toll on
Wagschal’s subjects. They register the full weight of their own
histories. The labor in question is well matched by the artist’s own
labor in executing the work. Never very prolific, and by necessity
(she labors exactingly over each and every work for months at a
time), she completes only a handful of paintings in any given
year. But those she does execute pull no punches. They dissect
the psychological and physiological factuality of their subjects
without flinching, without blinking or anything like sentimentality.
Coninue to Page 2
Go to: [1, 2, 3, 4]
Copyright © 2005, The Plattsburgh State Art Museum.
All rights reserved. Copyright Statement
101 Broad Street, Plattsburgh, NY 12901
Phone: (518) 564-2474
Send comments to: Plattsburgh State Art Museum
Last Updated: September 28, 2005